| Equipment Owned | W2XQ |
| receivers and transceivers on the table... |
|
In 2006, in my opinion the annual Passport to World Band Radio is the most comprehensive source of current receiver reviews for just about all currently-produced portable or tabletop receiver in the marketplace. New receiver reviews are also published in the annual World Radio TV Handbook and in the magazine Monitoring Times. A good source for older receiver reviews on the 'net is the Radio Netherlands Receiver Shopping List, but due to the lack of interesting new shortwave-capable tabletop or portable receivers in the last half-dozen years no additional reviews have been published. The RNW site does carry a few reviews of receivers with other delivery systems, such as satellite; I believe it is the only Web source for this kind of receiver. In January 2006 RNW there is a statement that the section will remain on the Web site for the foreseeable future, but no new sets will be tested. For HF receivers no longer made, from 2004 Universal Radio's DXing.com offers a concise summary of receivers made manufactured since the 1970's. Lots of information, highly recommended. |
|
Table-top
receivers
The Japan
Radio Company NRD-525 and NRD-535D
receivers are excellent radios(we haven't yet played with the NRD-545).
We like the optional 1 kHz filter for digital signal utility signal monitoring,
something not offered by ICOM and Kenwood. We like Some owners complained about the NRD-525 audio quality. The audio quality was addressed in later models but it was not the quality of the Lowe HF-150 or ICOM IC-R75. There are some mods to change a few components in the audio chain, and these changes help to increase the tonal control range. Many of the mid-1990's audio sound files were recorded with the NRD-525 and the NRD-535D. We had a retro moment on July 26, 2000, and picked up a (third) clean used NRD-525 with the computer control board. (The first receiver was destroyed by lightning; the second sold when the NRD-535D arrived). In retrospect, we believe the NRD-525 has less digital display noise than the NRD-535D and that makes for a better LW receiver than the NRD-535D. In terms of computer control capabilities, the Drake R8-series and Japan Radio Company receivers offer the best set of instructional commands.
With the optional IF-150 interface cord, the HF-150 has limited computer control; data can only be sent to, but not read from, the receiver. The Drake
R8B receiver was a good value when introduced. It has good audio, all filters included, and a serial port for computer control. Note
that for the digital signal listener, the R8-series suffer from not displaying
the nominal carrier frequency. I had to keep a calculator nearby, to
subtract 2.125 kHz for RTTY and 1.9 kHz for In October 1998 we tested the new Ten-Tec RX-320 DSP PC receiver. It is a black box with software controls (Windows), and it is a remarkable receiver for the low price of $295. The WiNRADiO
WR-1500e arrived in December 1998. First impressions: a quality product,
nice software, great on VHF and UHF. But in early tests we note that at
night there is signal overload on the main shortwave broadcast bands...
and the receiver documentation suggests using shorter antennas and preselectors.
And there is only one AM bandwidth. If shortwave-only is your interest,
stay with the Ten-Tec
RX-320. The ICOM IC-R75 arrived mid-January 2000. (See another review in the January 2000 QST.) Bottom line, we like the radio. The attractive price point properly placed the unit between the HF-150 and the Drake R8B or AOR AR-7030 PLUS receivers (depending upon your location in the world).
There are other tabletop receivers out there, and we do look, but sensibilities limit the number of receivers we purchase at any given time. In September 2000 we had a firesale and cleared the tabletop of a half-dozen tabletop and portable receivers, keeping only the NRD-525. There may be a message in here, but we have not yet figured it out... :-) A Ten-Tec RX-350 DSP receover arrived on 14 December 2001 and sold in late 2004 as we were just not using the unit enough to justify keeping. Overall a decent, quite sensitive receiver, but the LW performance was suspect due to the MW signal break-through. In January 2006, I don't know if the problem has been fixed. 1. From Radio Shack, in the 2001 catalog, our favorite speaker is now known as the RCA PRO-X44AV (black #40-5001, white #40-5002). It sells for US$60 but often goes on sale at a considerable savings. The speaker was formally known as the Radio Shack Optimus PRO X44AV (black #40-2080, white #40-2081) and prior to that the Radio Shack PRO 7AV (white #40-2048, black #40-2059). We use this speaker on all receivers on the tabletop. |
![]() March 1996 |
| Starting at the upper left, counterclockwise: RF Systems SP-2 Signal Splitter, R8A, NRD-535, DES M-6000 digital decoder, Frankford Radio Club CW keyer with Bencher iambic keyer, Kenwood transmit monitor, JST-245, HF-150 and PR-150. Off to the right: Heathkit SWR meter. Not shown: video monitor for M-6000, DenTron Super Super Tuner, IC-27H, rf Concepts 175w 2mFM amplifier. |
![]() August 2000 |
| Starting at the upper left, counterclockwise: HF-150 and PR-150, RF Systems SP-2 NRD-525, SW8, IC-R75, Not shown: IC-27H, rf Concepts 175w 2mFM amplifier. |
|
Portable receivers
For the Radio Netherlands Receiver Shopping List, in February 2001 we reviewed the Yaesu VR-500 manufactured by Vertex Standard. See the September 2003 issue of QST for a second review of the VR-500. This tiny handheld radio covers from 0.1 MHz to 1.3 GHz and runs on a pair of AA batteries. So long as you do not overdo the antenna on the receiver front end, the performance is quite credible for price versus performance. We like the receiver, and often use it in the car with a short external antenna. We owned an ICOM IC-R5 (See a review in the August 2003 QST.) for a while too, similar in frequency coverage and performance to the VR-500, but we eventually sold it because of non-use. Perhaps it is just my tastes, but tuning directly to frequencies with the turn of a knob instead of a keyboard made the IC-R5 frustrating to use. To enable the hidden Narrow AM option on the VR-500 simply do the following. VR-500 NAM Unlock: Unlock the hidden menu options #33 "User Port" and #34 "Narrow AM" by pressing and holding four buttons while switching the radio on: 0,3,5 and 9. Menu #33 "User Port" does nothing, but the #34 "Narrow AM" option is very handy and works very well.
|
|
Transceivers
Reflections. Solid-state made maintenance a lot easier, but the 901DM was a disaster. I think it was built on a Friday afternoon at 4 p.m. prior to a long weekend. A series of Kenwoods came and went, with the JST-135 in-between. The TS-940S did yeoman service for many years, but the JST-245 was a honey. Absolutely smooth, quiet full break-in CW operation, and we received outstanding audio reports. From late summer 1997 we withdrew -- for reasons of deliberate interference to the SWL Net, we decided it wasn't worth the aggravation -- from HF operation, and sold the JST-245. (I don't anticipate returning to the HF bands anytime soon.) In September 1999 the North American office of Japan Radio Company told me that they expected to deliver a DSP transceiver to the marketplace in 2001. Undoubtedly it will be based upon the NRD-545 receiver. The new transceiver has yet to surface in the first quarter of 2003. That's no surprise, really, as JRC has a reputation of bringing product to the market long after anticipated deadlines -- witness the NRD-545 timeline -- and the sour economy in Japan and elsewhere. |
|
VHF Transceivers
Reflections. The ICOM-27H was the first 2-meter mobile unit to have a full PL-encode set within, and it's worked well over the many years. The VX-5R, new in March 1999, is a marvelous 3-band (50, 144, 440 MHz) HT that covers the MW band, SW through 16 MHz and 48-999 MHz. (See a review in the May 1999 QST.) Not a DXing machine, but nevertheless a very interesting portable receiver for the SWL who is also licensed for the VHF bands. The 7.2V/1100 mAh battery seems to last forever between charges. We sold the HT a few months later, as we just did not use it enough while home recovering from back surgery to warrant tying up money in the unit; we bought a second one in March 2002 when the VX-150 failed. In June 2000 we purchased a 2m VX-150 HT to take with us on vacations. Vertex is the commercial side of Yaesu; see the August 2000 issue of QST for a review of the VX-150. In December 2005 I sold both the VX-150 and the VX-5R and bought a VX-6R. The reason was simple. Memories increased five-fold to more than 900, and the unit covered the entire HF spectrum. For traveling, it means I do not alway carry the VR-500 with me. See the December 2005 issue of QST for a review of the VX-6R. |
|
Main
Sections Convention
Information |
Media & Radio Mailing List & IRC |
About Us |
Miscellaneous |
| Use RSS News Reader to Read Breaking News, Info and Monitor Web Site Updates. |
|
1 February 2006 |